FAQ   •  Search
Log in  •  Register
 
Review of the new album at melodicrock.com
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    www.tnttheband.com Forum Index -> Reviews
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SKISPRINGER



Joined: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 146
Location: GREECE

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2007 10:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bjodahl wrote:
SKISPRINGER wrote:
bjodahl wrote:
DCK wrote:
Quote:
VAN HALEN

AC/DC

BLACK SABBATH


They can hardly be compared.


Question Why not Question


O.K.
WE HAVE ALSO

IRON MAIDEN
JUDAS PRIEST...
THAT WASN'T SO SUCCESS...

THE SECRET IS THAT IN BLACK SABBATH AND VAN HALEN REPLACED BY BETTER SINGER(WANT TO HEAR IT OR NOT).
BON SCOTT WAS A LITTLE BIT BETTER THAN BRIAN JOHNSON
BUT AC/DC WAS ALMOST IN THE START OF THEIR IN'L CAREER AND THE WORLD HEARD ABOUT THEM WITH BRIAN JOHNSON.



Ehhh...Iron Maiden did pretty good i think after Bruce Dickinson Joined the band Razz

But of course, Running Free is a great song written by Harris / Di'Anno, and their first album had a top 4 on the uk hitlist Smile

And yes SKI, i understand that you are thinking on the Bayley period. Laughing


Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
NO! I'M THINKING ABOUT DICKINSON PERIOD!!! Shocked Shocked Laughing Laughing


O.K. SERIOUSLY NOW IN THIS CASE DICKINSON IS BETTER(OF COURSE) THAN DI ANNO
BUT I KNOW SOME PEOPLE WHO NEVER ACCEPTED DICKINSON AS A SINGER INSTEAD OF DI ANNO. Shocked
_________________
www.bbsociety.com
for TH,TNT,music,fun,babe of the day
and free spirits...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Turbo Sensonic



Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 18
Location: Hellsinki, Finland

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SKISPRINGER wrote:
O.K. SERIOUSLY NOW IN THIS CASE DICKINSON IS BETTER(OF COURSE) THAN DI ANNO
BUT I KNOW SOME PEOPLE WHO NEVER ACCEPTED DICKINSON AS A SINGER INSTEAD OF DI ANNO. Shocked


I like them both. Both had/have different approach to Iron Maiden songs. I've never met Bruce Dickinson in person, but I've met Paul Di'Anno and although his reputation as being "The Beast", he's a very nice chap to talk with. He even wrote a dedication to the DVD and the book I had with me. Very nice indeed.

One more "singer comparison" could be Helloween. I think that Michael Kiske was the best heavy metal singer in the world and he's technically very good, but he drove the band to the direction which wasn't "Helloween" anymore. So although his replacement Andi Deris is not as good singer technically, he brought new blood to Helloween and they stayed in their "heavy metal bandwagon" and have still done great albums.

As a Finnish guy, I'm really looking forward to new Nightwish album. The singer has changed but the main songwriter is still in the band...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SKISPRINGER



Joined: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 146
Location: GREECE

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 1:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i agree 66% with you... Razz
andy is a great singer. this is my only argument with you...
but you know sometimes a singer seems like to be born for a certain band.
andy was for pc 69...
_________________
www.bbsociety.com
for TH,TNT,music,fun,babe of the day
and free spirits...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PeSt



Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 377

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2007 2:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

... and Helmut Lotti was born to the elevator music genre... Wink

I'll let you all in on a secret - People sometimes don't get along. And there is nothing anyone can do about it. My saddest moment in rock was when Triumph and Rik Emmet couldn't get along. Whatever the reasons were, I'm sure they were important enough for one or more of the parties to act the way they did. Did it seem rational from my point of view - a fan ? Not at all. Is there anything I can do, or could have done ? Probably not.

Looking at the rock history we see lots of people moving back and forth between backs. Some have made success, some haven't. The point is that they believed at the time that they were doing the right thing, and it is their artistic (and sometimes financial and other reasons) belief that made it so. We can speculate all we want, but part of the mysteries should remain untold stories. At least until the (un)authorized biography comes ot (Lemmy, Mötley Crüe etc).... Wink The stories are their to tell.

We're way off topic, and we may continue this in the off-topic.

PeSt

PS: Helmot Lotti may (or may not) disagree with me. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phantom Rider



Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:58 pm    Post subject: OMG Reply with quote

As with every TNT CD I spend so much money getting an import here to the USA. This one was no different except the final result. First off do NOT bust my balls since I have been there from the beginning with this band. I could understand this CD if this band was renamed. I hear people say the songs have "humor" in them. Sorry I would have purchased a comedy CD if I wanted humor. If there is humor in the songs then it sure is not "American humor" because I do not get it. It must be an inside joke. I can not put to words my shock listening to this CD.
I beg of you to rename this band. This may be enjoyable to some but it is NOT TNT. I am not knocking the talent of this band or Tony Mills. I do not mean to offend anyone with this post but I would not consider this as an advertised TNT CD. Maybe this CD was made for a more local audience but here in America well... we just don't get it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SKISPRINGER



Joined: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 146
Location: GREECE

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:10 am    Post subject: Re: OMG Reply with quote

Phantom Rider wrote:
As with every TNT CD I spend so much money getting an import here to the USA. This one was no different except the final result. First off do NOT bust my balls since I have been there from the beginning with this band. I could understand this CD if this band was renamed. I hear people say the songs have "humor" in them. Sorry I would have purchased a comedy CD if I wanted humor. If there is humor in the songs then it sure is not "American humor" because I do not get it. It must be an inside joke. I can not put to words my shock listening to this CD.
I beg of you to rename this band. This may be enjoyable to some but it is NOT TNT. I am not knocking the talent of this band or Tony Mills. I do not mean to offend anyone with this post but I would not consider this as an advertised TNT CD. Maybe this CD was made for a more local audience but here in America well... we just don't get it.


some people deny to accept this...
me personally i agree 100% in every single word....
_________________
www.bbsociety.com
for TH,TNT,music,fun,babe of the day
and free spirits...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ralf



Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 144
Location: Hannover, Germany

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:19 am    Post subject: Re: OMG Reply with quote

Phantom Rider wrote:
As with every TNT CD I spend so much money getting an import here to the USA. This one was no different except the final result. First off do NOT bust my balls since I have been there from the beginning with this band. I could understand this CD if this band was renamed. I hear people say the songs have "humor" in them. Sorry I would have purchased a comedy CD if I wanted humor. If there is humor in the songs then it sure is not "American humor" because I do not get it. It must be an inside joke. I can not put to words my shock listening to this CD.
I beg of you to rename this band. This may be enjoyable to some but it is NOT TNT. I am not knocking the talent of this band or Tony Mills. I do not mean to offend anyone with this post but I would not consider this as an advertised TNT CD. Maybe this CD was made for a more local audience but here in America well... we just don't get it.


I agree 100% Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LeFreak



Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 73
Location: MA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know who "we" is, but I'm from the US, and I "get it." I think that there is a lighter mood and a "cheekiness" that we only got tiny glimpses of in past TNT. But a lot of "we" in America don't get a more British/European sense of humour anyway. Too bad.

There's been such an amazing backlash, primarily from professed fans, like never before. Melodicrock.com (almost melodic crock[dot]com), Heavy Harmonies, and even the forums, are rife with it. I've never seen a band so intensely pigeon-holed by its own professed fans (so this isn't directed toward all fans, to be clear). More alarming is the fact that so many seem to stick around to take jabs at them, rather than just giving up on the band and leaving. It's almost like a sport or a game. TNT is a piñata, and a lot of blindfolded kids are taking whacks at it, although I don't think any candy is going to come out anytime soon.

Anyway, we need to help TNT to understand what the fans want! We need suggestions!

Ronni: Don't let a solo go by without at least one barrage of 32-notes. If the guitar's not smokin', then the music's chokin'!

Tony: Scream your brains out until your nose is bleeding, and my ears are too. If it's not breakin' glass, then it's suckin' ass! And don't ever forget that TH is a god among men. No one will ever measure up. Don't forget that every time you step up to a mike. **No offense to TH, but I'm trying to make a point, here**

Diesel: we need more crazy drum rolls, and some heavy double-bass drumming would up the ante with the heavy factor and keep the other guys in line. HEAVY f****n' METAL!!!

TNT: The band really needs to change its name. I suggest you start spelling it backwards! We need another "Tell No Tales" or "Intuition" desperately. Just use the same chords/progressions, but rearrange the lyrics a little so we'll be fooled. And there just aren't enough songs with viking themes anymore. Another "Seven Seas" would be nice. It's the 21st century: aren't there more than just seven seas to sing about now? There's a whole territory to mine! Same album, different cover. It works for AC/DC! There's no room for experimenting in TNT: that's what solo albums are for! It would be nice to see you guys squeeze into some spandex again. After all, spandex never died: you just don't see it on people outside of gyms anymore. Or, denim and leather would suffice, because people think of TNT as a HEAVY METAL band, and not the melodic rock that they seem to be. Some studs and spikes on the outfits wouldn't hurt either. And remember: most of us are stuck in the 80's, so we need TNT to write a bunch of tunes like they would've in their early-mid 20's.

Sorry, but there may have been a hint of sarcasm in there. If anyone was offended, then they probably needed to be. I've watched fights, battles, insults, jabs, pokes, verbal sucker-punches, etc. for what seems like months. I even saw that kiss-ass bastard Bryan from SorceryStudios take a very cheap jab on melodiccrock.com. I would've thought that was beneath him, but he showed his true colors (very professional). I don't really care much about any of it, although it makes for darkly humorous reading. Still, I strongly think all the people who have some kind of bizarre expectations from any true musicians who are trying to explore sound (not their sound, but sound and style in general) should just back their bags and leave, not letting the door hit them in their individual or collective asses on the way out. Simple as that. There's always a turnover rate in most long-time bands' fanbases, so the people who can't (or won't) grow with a band should just shut up and leave. There's plenty of other stuff out there, and so many bands playing straight up hard rock and metal with little variation from one disc to the next. Find 'em; embrace 'em; make sonic whoopee with 'em!

It's funny how some people make outlandish statements (in the past) like "Tony Harnell is God" or "Ronni LeTekro is God." They're just some guys making a living making music. Still, it's the fans (not all, for the hyper-sensitive) who are the first to crucify a band. People who don't follow the band exclusively are usually the most objective, it seems.

I find it hilarious when people say that some will blindly love anything Tekro or TNT does without question, when I know that so many more will heartily embrace (and all but dry-hump) anything Harnell releases, and with much fanfare and parading as well. I don't believe in laying the praise on too thick on either side: credit where credit is due. I try not to viciously attack either, because all true artists are just trying to follow their muse. But, alas, perhaps they've gone too far at last, and it's time to get back to painting by numbers. TNT should let all the fans write their next album, and they'll just record the resulting material and release the finished product.

Now, I'm going to listen to some pre-1989 TNT on vinyl, because we all know that TNT ceased to exist as a true band after 1989. Oh yeah, there was a little creative hiccup called My Religion that sent a shiver through the fans, but it's not on vinyl so I'm not playin' it! Laughing Laughing Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeSt



Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 377

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good honest summarizing post that shows opinions shared by many.

Props.

PeSt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steinman



Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 22
Location: Neverland

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:12 pm    Post subject: Re: OMG Reply with quote

Phantom Rider wrote:
As with every TNT CD I spend so much money getting an import here to the USA. This one was no different except the final result. First off do NOT bust my balls since I have been there from the beginning with this band. I could understand this CD if this band was renamed. I hear people say the songs have "humor" in them. Sorry I would have purchased a comedy CD if I wanted humor. If there is humor in the songs then it sure is not "American humor" because I do not get it. It must be an inside joke. I can not put to words my shock listening to this CD.
I beg of you to rename this band. This may be enjoyable to some but it is NOT TNT. I am not knocking the talent of this band or Tony Mills. I do not mean to offend anyone with this post but I would not consider this as an advertised TNT CD. Maybe this CD was made for a more local audience but here in America well... we just don't get it.


I can't see no reason for the band to change their name because a CD sound a bit different to the last one. If TNT should do that they really should have done it when they released "Firefly". There was in fact more negative feedback from the fans back then than it is now, and so many people were disappointed that the reformed TNT came out sounding so different to what they expected.

I've never cared about whether an album sound like a band "should" sound or not. All I care about is if I like the music or not. If a band should change their name every time the music changes, there would be a lot of bands who had to change their names.

Let me use a couple of examples here. To me "(Music From) The Elder" is one of the greatest Kiss albums, but there's no way it really sounds like a Kiss album. That doesn't matter as long as I enjoy the music, and I never wanted the band to change their name because of that album. The same goes for Metallica, who changed pretty much with "Load" and "ReLoad". Ok, so those albums don't sound like "Master Of Puppets" or "Ride The Lightning", but I can't see a reason the band should have changed their name.

Some will now obviously say that the difference with TNT is that they also changed singer, but quite a few bands have done that as well over the years. Think of Mötley Crüe when they had John Corabi in the band. He is a completely different singer to Vince Neil, and the "Mötley Crüe" album sounds nothing like any other Mötley Crüe albums, but then again neither did "Generation Swine" which they did when Vince returned to the band. Actually, Mötley Crüe is pretty much like TNT in the sense that they have never released two albums which sound the same.

Another example of a band changing singer, with a lot of controversy surrounding it is Van Halen. People seemed to have a really hard time accepting that Sammy Hagar replaced David Lee Roth, but in the end that actually worked out really well, both musically and commercially. Yes, the band changed, and quite a few people voiced their opinion saying the band should change their name, but the band kept on as Van Halen. That's not really surprising since it's not a common thing to change a band's name.

There will always be some people who won't accept changes. Look at AC/DC, and all the people who still can't stand Brian Johnson, and won't accept the band without Bon Scott. If that's your opinion that's fair enough, but then you can just ignore every album released by the band after 1979.

You don't have to like a change in a band, but there's not much point in complaining about the changes either. Sure, you have the right to voice your opinion, but at some point you have to move on. Something the Bon Scott fanatics really should do 27 years after the great man passed away. I know it's a bit early regarding TNT since the changes just happened, but at some point people have to accept that Tony Harnell is not in the band anymore.

We also have no clue what TNT would have sounded like if Harnell had stayed in the band. It might would have been even more far off from what people had expected, but then I think it would have been easier for some to accept musical changes.

My advise is anyway to just listen to the music, and don't care too much about what the band is called or if it sounds "right". Music is always best enjoyed if you've got an open mind. Then if you listen to an album with an open mind and don't like it, that's fair enough. No one have the right to force you to like anything, but you should not be afraid of admitting to like something that's not hip to admit liking either. Just listen to all kinds of music, and make up your own mind about whether you like it or not then.

I don't know how many people had made up their minds about not wanting to like "The New Territory" before they heard it, but it would really be surprising if no one did that. It's always like that with changes, and there's no reason why that shouldn't be the case with quite a few TNT fans as well. I'm not saying everyone who doesn't like the album did that, but there's always someone who's like that.

Now, go on enjoy "The New Territory", or dislike the album. Whatever you do, that's your right...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hawkiiz



Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 298
Location: rock n roll alley!

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i think that a lot of people think of this more like a vagabond record than a tnt record. thats the problem. ok?

yes. motley changed singer. and for me that record is not motley crue either. generation swine is motley crue, and i think its one of their absolute best albums. so what?

gnr have axl left from the old days, and dizzy that have been there since 1991. i still think its gnr. for me gnr is axl rose. from my point of view he deserve at least 60% of the credit for their success. and also i think they sound much better now. others dont agree and say slash must be there. i dont care.

with crue its different. for me they only have one line-up. if any of those quit, or god forbid they add another guitar player or whatever it will not be motley crue. not at all. because they are that gang.

i had to defend this bullshit after rockefeller to. even i said i loved the show Confused Confused so it seems it is hard to take for some people. the point is. i dont have any frakking ideological reason for enjoying a band or "accepting" the line-up under that specific name. it is how it feels for me that matters. nothing else!
_________________
www.bbsociety.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Phantom Rider



Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LeFreak wrote:
I don't know who "we" is, but I'm from the US, and I "get it." I think that there is a lighter mood and a "cheekiness" that we only got tiny glimpses of in past TNT. But a lot of "we" in America don't get a more British/European sense of humour anyway. Too bad.

There's been such an amazing backlash, primarily from professed fans, like never before. Melodicrock.com (almost melodic crock[dot]com), Heavy Harmonies, and even the forums, are rife with it. I've never seen a band so intensely pigeon-holed by its own professed fans (so this isn't directed toward all fans, to be clear). More alarming is the fact that so many seem to stick around to take jabs at them, rather than just giving up on the band and leaving. It's almost like a sport or a game. TNT is a piñata, and a lot of blindfolded kids are taking whacks at it, although I don't think any candy is going to come out anytime soon.

Anyway, we need to help TNT to understand what the fans want! We need suggestions!

Ronni: Don't let a solo go by without at least one barrage of 32-notes. If the guitar's not smokin', then the music's chokin'!

Tony: Scream your brains out until your nose is bleeding, and my ears are too. If it's not breakin' glass, then it's suckin' ass! And don't ever forget that TH is a god among men. No one will ever measure up. Don't forget that every time you step up to a mike. **No offense to TH, but I'm trying to make a point, here**

Diesel: we need more crazy drum rolls, and some heavy double-bass drumming would up the ante with the heavy factor and keep the other guys in line. HEAVY f****n' METAL!!!

TNT: The band really needs to change its name. I suggest you start spelling it backwards! We need another "Tell No Tales" or "Intuition" desperately. Just use the same chords/progressions, but rearrange the lyrics a little so we'll be fooled. And there just aren't enough songs with viking themes anymore. Another "Seven Seas" would be nice. It's the 21st century: aren't there more than just seven seas to sing about now? There's a whole territory to mine! Same album, different cover. It works for AC/DC! There's no room for experimenting in TNT: that's what solo albums are for! It would be nice to see you guys squeeze into some spandex again. After all, spandex never died: you just don't see it on people outside of gyms anymore. Or, denim and leather would suffice, because people think of TNT as a HEAVY METAL band, and not the melodic rock that they seem to be. Some studs and spikes on the outfits wouldn't hurt either. And remember: most of us are stuck in the 80's, so we need TNT to write a bunch of tunes like they would've in their early-mid 20's.

Sorry, but there may have been a hint of sarcasm in there. If anyone was offended, then they probably needed to be. I've watched fights, battles, insults, jabs, pokes, verbal sucker-punches, etc. for what seems like months. I even saw that kiss-ass bastard Bryan from SorceryStudios take a very cheap jab on melodiccrock.com. I would've thought that was beneath him, but he showed his true colors (very professional). I don't really care much about any of it, although it makes for darkly humorous reading. Still, I strongly think all the people who have some kind of bizarre expectations from any true musicians who are trying to explore sound (not their sound, but sound and style in general) should just back their bags and leave, not letting the door hit them in their individual or collective asses on the way out. Simple as that. There's always a turnover rate in most long-time bands' fanbases, so the people who can't (or won't) grow with a band should just shut up and leave. There's plenty of other stuff out there, and so many bands playing straight up hard rock and metal with little variation from one disc to the next. Find 'em; embrace 'em; make sonic whoopee with 'em!

It's funny how some people make outlandish statements (in the past) like "Tony Harnell is God" or "Ronni LeTekro is God." They're just some guys making a living making music. Still, it's the fans (not all, for the hyper-sensitive) who are the first to crucify a band. People who don't follow the band exclusively are usually the most objective, it seems.

I find it hilarious when people say that some will blindly love anything Tekro or TNT does without question, when I know that so many more will heartily embrace (and all but dry-hump) anything Harnell releases, and with much fanfare and parading as well. I don't believe in laying the praise on too thick on either side: credit where credit is due. I try not to viciously attack either, because all true artists are just trying to follow their muse. But, alas, perhaps they've gone too far at last, and it's time to get back to painting by numbers. TNT should let all the fans write their next album, and they'll just record the resulting material and release the finished product.

Now, I'm going to listen to some pre-1989 TNT on vinyl, because we all know that TNT ceased to exist as a true band after 1989. Oh yeah, there was a little creative hiccup called My Religion that sent a shiver through the fans, but it's not on vinyl so I'm not playin' it! Laughing Laughing Laughing


I enjoy every TNT CD except this one and now I am not a fan? I think that you may be blinded by your loyalty. I figured someone would come on here and try to make me out to be the "only Metal or else" type. I love how some people have to try to make less of a person because they don't share the same opinion. I am glad that you enjoy the CD. Even if I did enjoy it others have a right to their opinion. Remember "we" do have something called freedom of speech. It is not a "backlash" against a band. I just do not enjoy this CD and it barely resembles any TNT CD. This CD is even more obscure than Firefly, which I enjoy.


Last edited by Phantom Rider on Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LeFreak



Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 73
Location: MA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phantom Rider: One, I'm not blinded by loyalty. I really love this release. No kidding! Call me crazy, but don't call me late for supper. This response wasn't about you, actually, but I guess your post became the segueway into my finally posting what I've thought about all the negativity surrounding the new release, mainly because of the "we" statement when, in fact, you don't represent me (from same nation) at all. I have to turn that "w" upside down and say "me" gets it. But the rest of the response is just to dozens of posts at various places over the last month+. It's not emotional, or charged, or anything, it's just my turn at voicing my honest opinion. I think you just finally unlocked it with the all-inclusive "we" statement, prompting me to speak for myself.

Personally, I would say "It was cool having you around as a fellow TNT fan, bon voyage," now that you are a self-described former TNT fan. The backlash from this has been so wild, I'm expecting to see TNT recovery meetings soon ("I'm ——, and I was a TNT fan" *everyone claps supportively). And it's nothing personal: that goes to all the people saying they were a fan, they'll never buy a TNT album again, this is the last straw, yada yada yada.

I guess I just don't "get it." I don't think it's that outlandish an album as people are claiming. It's not that bizarre. Definitely not in proportion to the backlash it seems to be getting. Granted, there's a bit more dissonance than usual, and some odd shifts in songwriting style from track to track, but I think this release features some of the catchiest choruses I've ever heard on a TNT album. Definitely the coolest harmony vocals, hands down (to my ears). Maybe because they're not so perfect (which seems very deliberate to me). The arrangements are a little odd and more experimental than what some would've liked, considering that the songs are still just melodic rock. There's some very standard ideas on here, but they're combined with some oddball choices in direction that may not have been the best choices if you wanted radio airplay, or to be more mainstream (or obviously to appease a group of fans).

Anyway, fans come and go, and so it goes. The reason I suppose I find it so funny is that I've watched so many bands make changes (some great examples brought out by others here), but I've never attacked them (not that you are; I'm just making a point) like so many are doing. I just go elsewhere for my music. I don't go onto messageboards or forums and slag their music. For instance: Harem Scarem. I think "Weight of the World" was a masterpiece. The two that followed next were disappointing, but I bought them. I even listen to them every once in a blue moon. The new one just didn't grab me when I listened to the sound samples...so I didn't buy it. I still have yet to go to a Harem Scarem forum and say that the band should change its name because they changed their direction too often, or that Pete Lesperance forgot how to play the guitar just because he's not playing quite the same as on WotW or "Mood Swings." I just didn't buy the new album. Simple as that. But I'm not a "former" Harem Scarem fan. I'm technically still a fan, because I love select material from their catalog. Also, I'm not "former," because I'll still check out the next one, knowing how they like to shift direction often. The recent one just wasn't my cup o' tea, so I'm skipping it. I'd still see them live if they came around (although I wonder if they've ever played in the U.S.), and I'll still give the next one a chance.

I'm just saying, there's a lot of over-reaction to this release. I'm wondering how many people will dig it out in six month's time out of boredom, stick it in the player, and suddenly like—or love—it. I think a lot of this is just the initial shock that it's really a bit different than what people may have wanted, especially because so many are Jonesing for another "Tell No Tales" or "Intuition," which is sad in itself, asking the band to just repeat itself (like asking them to "please, take a few steps backward"). Look at how different "Firefly" was, and "Transistor." I just don't see how this is any more radical than what we've already seen, with or without TH. Actually, I believe we should expect this from TNT, and be disappointed it they don't! It's their nature by now: why should they change? It's not the monster it's made out to be, especially at Heavy Harmonies and Melodicrock.com (but I just can't be on every forum and message board: three is enough for me!). Andrew was objective and professional, but a lot of people have just stooped to slinging mud (and feces). Again, generally speaking, not directing at you.

Anyway, awesome reading the posts as always. No one can say TNT doesn't have intelligent fans: we just have to agree to disagree a lot. Steinman makes excellent points!! Way to go!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeSt



Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 377

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good post. The post you did on the BBS forum only put in better words than mine, some of the reasons why The New Territory is such a great listening experience. And why it should be played loud enough to allow all facets of the song through. There is some musical and mixing gems thrown in here and there.

Thanks for your insight.

PeSt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phantom Rider



Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LeFreak wrote:
Phantom Rider: One, I'm not blinded by loyalty. I really love this release. No kidding! Call me crazy, but don't call me late for supper. This response wasn't about you, actually, but I guess your post became the segueway into my finally posting what I've thought about all the negativity surrounding the new release, mainly because of the "we" statement when, in fact, you don't represent me (from same nation) at all. I have to turn that "w" upside down and say "me" gets it. But the rest of the response is just to dozens of posts at various places over the last month+. It's not emotional, or charged, or anything, it's just my turn at voicing my honest opinion. I think you just finally unlocked it with the all-inclusive "we" statement, prompting me to speak for myself.

Personally, I would say "It was cool having you around as a fellow TNT fan, bon voyage," now that you are a self-described former TNT fan. The backlash from this has been so wild, I'm expecting to see TNT recovery meetings soon ("I'm ——, and I was a TNT fan" *everyone claps supportively). And it's nothing personal: that goes to all the people saying they were a fan, they'll never buy a TNT album again, this is the last straw, yada yada yada.

I guess I just don't "get it." I don't think it's that outlandish an album as people are claiming. It's not that bizarre. Definitely not in proportion to the backlash it seems to be getting. Granted, there's a bit more dissonance than usual, and some odd shifts in songwriting style from track to track, but I think this release features some of the catchiest choruses I've ever heard on a TNT album. Definitely the coolest harmony vocals, hands down (to my ears). Maybe because they're not so perfect (which seems very deliberate to me). The arrangements are a little odd and more experimental than what some would've liked, considering that the songs are still just melodic rock. There's some very standard ideas on here, but they're combined with some oddball choices in direction that may not have been the best choices if you wanted radio airplay, or to be more mainstream (or obviously to appease a group of fans).

Anyway, fans come and go, and so it goes. The reason I suppose I find it so funny is that I've watched so many bands make changes (some great examples brought out by others here), but I've never attacked them (not that you are; I'm just making a point) like so many are doing. I just go elsewhere for my music. I don't go onto messageboards or forums and slag their music. For instance: Harem Scarem. I think "Weight of the World" was a masterpiece. The two that followed next were disappointing, but I bought them. I even listen to them every once in a blue moon. The new one just didn't grab me when I listened to the sound samples...so I didn't buy it. I still have yet to go to a Harem Scarem forum and say that the band should change its name because they changed their direction too often, or that Pete Lesperance forgot how to play the guitar just because he's not playing quite the same as on WotW or "Mood Swings." I just didn't buy the new album. Simple as that. But I'm not a "former" Harem Scarem fan. I'm technically still a fan, because I love select material from their catalog. Also, I'm not "former," because I'll still check out the next one, knowing how they like to shift direction often. The recent one just wasn't my cup o' tea, so I'm skipping it. I'd still see them live if they came around (although I wonder if they've ever played in the U.S.), and I'll still give the next one a chance.

I'm just saying, there's a lot of over-reaction to this release. I'm wondering how many people will dig it out in six month's time out of boredom, stick it in the player, and suddenly like—or love—it. I think a lot of this is just the initial shock that it's really a bit different than what people may have wanted, especially because so many are Jonesing for another "Tell No Tales" or "Intuition," which is sad in itself, asking the band to just repeat itself (like asking them to "please, take a few steps backward"). Look at how different "Firefly" was, and "Transistor." I just don't see how this is any more radical than what we've already seen, with or without TH. Actually, I believe we should expect this from TNT, and be disappointed it they don't! It's their nature by now: why should they change? It's not the monster it's made out to be, especially at Heavy Harmonies and Melodicrock.com (but I just can't be on every forum and message board: three is enough for me!). Andrew was objective and professional, but a lot of people have just stooped to slinging mud (and feces). Again, generally speaking, not directing at you.

Anyway, awesome reading the posts as always. No one can say TNT doesn't have intelligent fans: we just have to agree to disagree a lot. Steinman makes excellent points!! Way to go!


I had to add a question mark after that first sentence. I am a fan but it does not make me not a fan by not liking this release. When I said "we", I was not speaking for you. Sorry if you took it that way. I was speaking for the group of US that I have spoken to. You are the first one that likes the CD that I know of from the US. The original post was not offensive at all. I just gave my opinion of the CD. No disrespect to the band again. Enjoy your CD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    www.tnttheband.com Forum Index -> Reviews All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
AllSat 20  - hedonism - 2006